You're offline — showing cached data
BibaMoney TVIJO AIOS NETWORK
fine as savings — measure vs holding

Recurring buy (DCA savings)

Buy a fixed amount on schedule regardless of price — marketed as the stress-free way to accumulate.

What it actually does

A calendar, not a strategy: market-buys a fixed fiat amount daily, weekly or monthly.

Where it exists

Offered by:

OKXBybitGate.io

Before running it anywhere, compare what the round-trips will cost on the fees page — on thin edges the fee tier decides the outcome.

Our out-of-sample verdict: fine as savings — measure vs holding

As a discipline tool it does its job. But measure any bot against the boring benchmark: on SOL, plain buy-and-hold beat every trading bot we tested. Recurring buys ARE a form of holding — the question is only whether the schedule beats a lump sum, and historically it usually costs a little expected return for a lot of psychological comfort.

Our holding benchmark data →
The risk beginners miss: The bot removes timing stress, not asset risk: a schedule of buys into a dying asset is just slower losing.

Test strategies with $0 at risk → Our testing method

Other bot types: Grid bot · DCA / Martingale bot · Signal bot · Funding-rate arbitrage bot · Iceberg / TWAP execution · Smart portfolio / rebalancer