Xiaoyao Lee
EWY · SPK · TSM +5
100/ 100 Trader Safe Score
Reported PnL+6.8% (+$12k)
Worst week−4.6pp
Lead track1280d
Copiers · funds444/600 · $137k
OKX lead traders, ranked by durability — not by hype
These are real copy-trading lead traders from OKX's official public API, re-ranked by our Trader Safe Score: track length, real copiers with real money and week-to-week stability count for far more than any headline PnL. Browsing is free, no account needed.
1
Browse the rating — freeEvery trader, every warning sign, straight from OKX's public data.
2
Verify on OKXEach row links to the trader's live OKX profile — check every number at the source.
3
Register via our linkCopying happens on OKX with your funds on OKX. We earn a commission — that's how this stays free.
Safe Core — the shortlist we'd actually consider
Top scores under a formula where boring wins: long track, many real copiers, no violent weeks.
Jungle law
XAU · SOL · DOGE +5
100/ 100 Trader Safe Score
Reported PnL+5.2% (+$355k)
Worst week−1.4pp
Lead track720d
Copiers · funds426/1207 · $9.5M
PlymouthUltra
ICP · JUP · MINA +5
100/ 100 Trader Safe Score
Reported PnL+10.7% (+$1.2k)
Worst week−1.2pp
Lead track1144d
Copiers · funds246/1200 · $99k
Full Trader Safe Score rating
All lead traders from OKX's public leaderboard, best to worst under our formula. Loud PnL with no copiers and dust funds scores exactly what it deserves.
| # | Comerciante | PnL* | Curve | Ganancia | Worst wk | Copiers | Track | Safe Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xiaoyao Lee EWY · SPK · TSM +5
🤖 Despite 1280 lead days, the 6.76% total PnL is modest and recent weekly returns show volatility from -3.53% to 11.36%. The genuine strength is a long track record with only 60% win rate, suggesting consistent but not exceptional risk management. |
+6.8% +$12k |
60% | −4.6pp | 444/600 $137k |
1280d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 2 | Jungle law XAU · SOL · DOGE +5
🤖 The 720-day track record is solid, but the 5.22% weekly PnL with zero drawdown reported is suspiciously smooth for a 65% win rate. The genuine strength is the large personal AUM aligned with copiers, reducing incentive for reckless risk. |
+5.2% +$355k |
65% | −1.4pp | 426/1207 $9.5M |
720d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 3 | PlymouthUltra ICP · JUP · MINA +5
🤖 Red flags: 1144 days but only 10.66% total PnL suggests extremely low risk-taking, and zero drawdown data is missing. Genuine strength: the 73.68% win rate is consistent, but the flat weekly PnL curve indicates minimal volatility, not skill. |
+10.7% +$1.2k |
74% | −1.2pp | 246/1200 $99k |
1144d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 4 | BestMax ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 754-day track record is solid, but the 73.53% win rate with only one negative weekly print suggests risk is masked by frequent small wins. The genuine strength is the consistent positive weekly returns over two years, though low volatility may hide tail risks. |
+5.0% +$5.1k |
74% | −2.2pp | 175/600 $179k |
754d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 5 | To the Moon Merchant XAU · SOL · TRUMP +5
🤖 1060 days is a solid track, but the 20.72% latest PnL is far below the 33.08% peak, showing declining momentum. The genuine strength is the long, consistent history that reduces the risk of a short-lived fluke. |
+20.7% +$43k |
53% | −13.0pp | 1185/1200 $2.6M |
1060d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 6 | Shallow-Pair-Frog ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+22.2% +$78k |
56% | −5.6pp | 350/600 $224k |
984d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 7 | 年内完成一个小目标 EWY · SPK · TSM +5
🤖 Red flags: 487 days but only $9K AUM and 45 copiers, with 18.53% ROI yet zero drawdown reported—likely leverage or data smoothing. The genuine strength is a consistent upward weekly PnL trend over the last 10 periods. |
+18.5% +$34k |
60% | −2.1pp | 45/300 $9.1k |
487d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 8 | Aspirin. ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 472 days with 54% win rate yet AUM is only $25k and weekly PnL% swings from 36% to 46% show inconsistent returns. The biggest caution is the massive gap between reported PnL and tiny follower money, suggesting this strategy may not scale or survive drawdowns. |
+36.2% +$54k |
54% | −9.3pp | 106/300 $25k |
472d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 9 | Mu BingYang ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 26% ROI over 336 days with zero drawdown reported is unrealistic; only 55 copiers out of 302 total suggests minimal trust. The flat weekly PnL% range indicates likely compounding or leverage artifacts, not organic growth. |
+26.0% +$40k |
56% | −2.7pp | 55/302 $370k |
336d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 10 | Firsthand-ATL-Pansy ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+62.0% +$51k |
65% | −3.9pp | 55/300 $6.2k |
340d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 11 | Mark6666 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+73.2% +$63k |
48% | −13.2pp | 109/300 $15k |
187d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 12 | 金条大爷 ICP · JUP · MINA +5
🤖 822% ROI over 661 days with zero drawdown is implausible, and only $55K AUM from 46 copiers suggests low trust. The flat -0.35% weeks early on hint at hidden risk or data gaps. |
+822.3% +$261k |
66% | −0.2pp | 46/300 $56k |
661d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 13 | Linxixi ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 498 days of data but zero drawdown alongside 39.96% ROI and only $6.6K AUM suggests risk is hidden or the track record is cherry-picked. The genuine strength is the consistent weekly returns, but the tiny follower money implies copiers doubt the reliability. |
+40.0% +$102k |
57% | −9.0pp | 46/600 $6.7k |
498d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 14 | DegenBing ICP · JUP · MINA +5
|
+12.7% +$83k |
52% | −4.3pp | 3/300 $124 |
962d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 15 | Master Dust. ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 96.67% ROI with zero max drawdown reported is implausible, and only $219K AUM from 261 copiers suggests tiny average allocations. The 345-day track is too short to trust such extreme risk-adjusted returns. |
+96.7% +$267k |
60% | −30.7pp | 261/300 $220k |
345d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 16 | Mine13 ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+3.9% +$10k |
54% | −6.3pp | 110/602 $462k |
286d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 17 | Upward right BTC · ETH
|
-21.0% −$253k |
50% | −10.2pp | 186/600 $71k |
865d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 18 | Gloomy-Signal-Aronia ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 9.63% ROI on $22k profit but only $4.6k follower AUM and zero drawdown reported—short 327-day track record with suspiciously smooth weekly gains. The biggest red flag is implausible risk control: no losing weeks in 10 data points suggests hidden leverage or selective reporting. |
+9.6% +$22k |
58% | −4.8pp | 30/300 $4.6k |
327d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 19 | Pretty-Longmeixi-760 CAP · SAMSUNG · AAOI +4
🤖 Red flags: 63-day track record, zero maximum drawdown reported alongside 28.21% ROI, and only 219 copiers on $511K AUM suggest data gaps or risk concealment. The genuine strength is a consistent 30%+ weekly return over 10 weeks, but verify if this is from leverage or actual edge. |
+28.2% +$93k |
68% | −5.8pp | 219/300 $511k |
63d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 20 | speculation emperor ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 10.05% PnL with 56.67% win rate is decent, but 1039 days of data show a -11.43% weekly loss and only $37k AUM from 24 copiers. The real caution is the severe drawdowns hidden behind the headline return—this trader’s losses are larger and more frequent than the average gain suggests. |
+10.1% +$147k |
57% | −7.5pp | 24/300 $37k |
1039d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 21 | TradingNotes SOL · DOGE · XRP +3
|
+21.4% +$65k |
46% | −8.1pp | 18/301 $104k |
539d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 22 | HWAN100 EWY · SPK · TSM +5
|
+12.8% +$129k |
49% | −0.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
497d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 23 | 好望角9999 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 201% ROI over 543 days with only $33.6K AUM from 172 copiers suggests inflated returns from a small base. The zero drawdown and high weekly PnL consistency likely reflect leverage-driven volatility rather than sustainable edge. |
+201.3% +$416k |
57% | −24.4pp | 172/601 $34k |
543d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 24 | 0xleek.eth ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 25.86% ROI over 250 days with zero drawdown is implausible, and only $25K AUM from 4 copiers signals negligible trust. The genuine strength is the 55% win rate, but the missing drawdown data makes the returns unreliable for copying. |
+25.9% +$27k |
55% | −3.4pp | 4/303 $25k |
250d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 25 | 时间很有限 SOL · WLD · BNB +5
|
+19.0% +$45k |
45% | −3.4pp | 1/300 $50 |
1175d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 26 | btctangying ETHW · BTC
🤖 61.13% ROI over 1063 days hides a suspiciously flat equity curve with zero drawdown, while only $4167 AUM from 12 copiers suggests minimal real trust. The steady weekly returns near 60% likely reflect compounding leverage or deposit artifacts, not genuine trading skill. |
+61.1% +$58k |
52% | −6.4pp | 12/300 $4.2k |
1063d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 27 | pikawenjiantouzi EWY · RAVE · TSM +5
|
+58.8% +$147k |
47% | −20.5pp | 106/609 $87k |
254d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 28 | 134***6656 EWY · TSM · SPK +5
|
+36.6% +$36k |
48% | −6.2pp | 17/300 $2.2k |
587d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 29 | White-Block-Rims ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+50.4% +$293k |
61% | −5.5pp | 21/300 $3.5k |
1059d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 30 | YEREN-CHINA ICP · JUP · MINA +5
|
+31.2% +$56k |
53% | −18.6pp | 76/300 $13k |
608d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 31 | 人生没有如果 只有后果和结果 ETH
|
-11.4% −$45k |
50% | −10.8pp | 48/300 $37k |
551d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 32 | Regression ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-16.2% −$21k |
57% | −11.0pp | 56/300 $33k |
611d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 33 | Jerry杰睿 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 231 days is a short track record, and 7.72% PnL with zero drawdown is suspiciously smooth. The tiny copier count (28 of 318) suggests experienced followers are avoiding this strategy. |
+7.7% +$15k |
64% | −5.2pp | 28/318 $132k |
231d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 34 | sushansuying ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+5.7% +$14k |
56% | −3.6pp | 0/300 $0 |
272d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 35 | Monumental-DoS-Tiger ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+6.0% +$28k |
46% | −4.5pp | 0/300 $0 |
240d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 36 | Renoshi ICP · JUP · COMP +5
|
-2.0% −$36k |
51% | −2.0pp | 3/300 $844 |
711d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 37 | Key-JOMO-Yaupon SOL · BNB · BTC +1
|
-4.6% −$16k |
50% | −2.3pp | 3/300 $250 |
761d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 38 | CCaptain ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+1.3% +$2.1k |
59% | −1.8pp | 5/300 $258 |
270d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 39 | 稳稳赚钱 LDO · SOL · SUI +5
|
-8.1% −$29k |
51% | −4.9pp | 7/300 $9.2k |
812d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 40 | Sean Nexus Alpha ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 45.48% ROI over 307 days with only $3096 AUM and 14 copiers suggests inflated returns from tiny capital, while zero drawdown in the weekly data is implausible. The biggest red flag is that this trader's actual risk profile is hidden, as small accounts can show extreme returns from leverage or luck. |
+45.5% +$38k |
53% | −5.3pp | 14/300 $3.1k |
307d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 41 | xiaomijiahanyangzao ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 319-day track is short; 27.91% ROI with only $3,382 AUM and 15 copiers suggests minimal real trust. The near-flat weekly PnL% range (25.8–30.58) implies low volatility, not necessarily skill. |
+27.9% +$72k |
54% | −5.8pp | 15/300 $3.4k |
319d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 42 | Decent-Wallet-Bamboo ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 114-day track with 9.35% ROI yet only $300 AUM and 1 copier signals zero trust. The steady weekly gains with no drawdown suggest either tiny position sizing or a smoothed reporting artifact. |
+9.3% +$14k |
55% | −2.2pp | 1/300 $300 |
114d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 43 | Known-Cloud ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 130% ROI with zero drawdown and only 215 days of data is suspicious; copier capital is just $173K despite 205 followers. The huge weekly volatility (28% to 213%) suggests extreme leverage risk, not consistent skill. |
+130.8% +$261k |
60% | −50.0pp | 205/600 $173k |
215d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 44 | Green-ASIC-Cactus EWY · TSM · CAP +5
🤖 435 days but zero AUM and no copiers despite 5.35% PnL; the weekly PnL shows three consecutive -2.13% losses. The biggest red flag is no one trusts this trader with real money. |
+5.3% +$22k |
58% | −9.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
435d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 45 | 1491 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+3.3% +$33k |
51% | −17.3pp | 90/600 $18k |
1046d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 46 | kaiwin ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+40.5% +$525k |
42% | −25.8pp | 46/600 $10k |
573d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 47 | Harsh-Close-Auto ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 26% profit on just $1.4K AUM with 222 days of data shows extreme leverage risk, not skill. The tiny follower base and zero drawdown disclosure suggest the strategy is untested under real market stress. |
+26.2% +$132k |
56% | −7.3pp | 6/300 $1.4k |
222d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 48 | YXN EWY · HOOD · EWJ +5
🤖 Red flags: 248-day track with zero drawdown and 48% ROI is implausible; AUM is only $395 with just 2 copiers. The flat weekly PnL% for six consecutive weeks suggests stale or manipulated data. |
+48.3% +$65k |
52% | −7.6pp | 2/300 $395 |
248d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 49 | Ruddy-BTD-Moose ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 288-day track with 11.93% total PnL and 51% win rate is mediocre, while $53 AUM and 1 copier signal near-zero real trust. The biggest red flag is a tiny personal stake despite claiming $130k profit—likely leverage or position-size artifacts inflating returns. |
+11.9% +$131k |
51% | −7.3pp | 1/300 $53 |
288d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 50 | Expert-Ethash-Camel OKB · BTC · ETH
|
-7.7% −$19k |
53% | −49.1pp | 387/1001 $285k |
952d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 51 | 凤妤同舟币姐 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-1.4% −$2.6k |
55% | −3.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
516d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 52 | Scofield_2025 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-4.8% −$32k |
55% | −2.2pp | 0/300 $0 |
413d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 53 | bsjggyx66 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 131 days with zero AUM and no copiers suggests fabricated or demo-only performance. The 7.63% weekly PnL with zero drawdown is mathematically impossible in real trading. The biggest red flag is the complete absence of real follower capital despite a 55.56% win rate. |
+7.6% +$11k |
56% | −1.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
131d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 54 | galaxy* SOL · DOGE · BTC +1
|
+497.1% +$123k |
47% | −156.3pp | 214/600 $39k |
1156d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 55 | kvss ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+59.5% +$76k |
49% | −21.6pp | 18/300 $4.8k |
471d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 56 | huge77788 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+2.9% +$4.9k |
51% | −4.2pp | 1/300 $28k |
92d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 57 | liyuan-luo ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 583-day track with 68.94% PnL but only $1,525 AUM and 1 copier signals extreme distrust; zero drawdown data alongside 71.73% weekly peaks suggests risky volatility. The genuine strength is the recent 10-week positive streak, but the tiny follower base outweighs any performance. |
+68.9% +$134k |
61% | −20.0pp | 1/300 $1.5k |
583d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 58 | Trader KS XAU · BTC · ETH
|
-23.2% −$80k |
50% | −28.0pp | 43/300 $21k |
635d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 59 | 展星理财 CRV · DOGE · CL +5
|
+38.1% +$116k |
44% | −7.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
871d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 60 | Amusing-PoW-AirBags ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+97.6% +$215k |
81% | −37.4pp | 417/600 $223k |
77d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 61 | Rude-Gems-Leopard ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+28.2% +$137k |
80% | −38.2pp | 225/600 $116k |
75d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 62 | Bitlong PEOPLE · WLD · SATS +3
|
+1.3% +$4.5k |
60% | −0.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
742d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 63 | dong ge@ ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+0.8% +$4.5k |
56% | −6.3pp | 0/300 $0 |
458d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 64 | Dry-ATL-Antenna ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 315 days is a short track record, and the 7.18% ROI is modest with a 56.82% win rate. The main caution is the recent -9.38% weekly loss, showing significant volatility despite the overall positive trend. |
+7.2% +$58k |
57% | −18.2pp | 33/600 $44k |
315d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 65 | Ail.Wang ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
-2.4% −$22k |
56% | −7.8pp | 8/303 $31k |
924d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 66 | Steep-TLT-Motor ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-0.2% −$495 |
51% | −0.5pp | 0/600 $0 |
302d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 67 | Notable-Band-Iguana BTC · ETH
|
+7.1% +$7.9k |
49% | −6.4pp | 1/301 $500 |
103d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 68 | Miss S ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-7.2% −$33k |
54% | −4.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
288d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 69 | Ewan luck ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 882 days but only 4 weeks of active data, and $133.7 AUM with just 1 copier signals extreme caution. The real risk is an untested strategy behind a tiny live track record. |
+15.7% +$52k |
63% | −33.7pp | 1/300 $134 |
882d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 70 | Adored-Browser-Frog ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+110.7% +$249k |
83% | −22.1pp | 600/600 $346k |
75d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 71 | Elsa6688 BTC · ETH
🤖 164-day track is short; 249% ROI with zero drawdown is statistically implausible. The tiny copier-to-AUM ratio signals low genuine confidence from experienced followers. |
+249.6% +$143k |
61% | −29.6pp | 72/300 $192k |
164d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 72 | Auroraxwt ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 Only 26 days of data and zero drawdown alongside 16.23% weekly peak ROI suggest extreme risk-taking or data manipulation. The tiny copier count (8 of 302) and short track record make this unproven for sustainable copy-trading. |
+8.3% +$23k |
52% | −4.9pp | 8/302 $31k |
26d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 73 | Bare-Payee-Fox ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-21.6% −$39k |
52% | −18.6pp | 43/300 $7.3k |
184d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 74 | RuiJie EWY · SPK · TSM +5
|
-4.3% −$47k |
53% | −8.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
593d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 75 | Busy-Satoshi-Aralia ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-2.2% −$4.7k |
56% | −5.6pp | 0/300 $0 |
518d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 76 | Andyvillajr ICP · JUP · MINA +5
|
-0.1% −$544 |
52% | −7.3pp | 0/300 $0 |
878d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 77 | Linuxzhang BTC
|
-13.2% −$35k |
54% | −8.6pp | 0/300 $0 |
593d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 78 | Muted-Bandwidth-Fox BTC
|
-9.5% −$33k |
56% | −15.4pp | 27/300 $9.5k |
702d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 79 | Measly-qihang ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-7.2% −$20k |
53% | −9.9pp | 2/300 $167 |
187d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 80 | Mark1982 EWY · RAVE · TSM +5
|
-9.3% −$29k |
52% | −6.2pp | 2/300 $100 |
335d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 81 | OmniPos BTC · ETH
🤖 26-day track with 105% ROI but zero drawdown is unrealistic; 80 copiers on $627K AUM suggests minimal follower conviction. The weekly PnL volatility (85-108%) indicates extreme risk that could reverse sharply. |
+105.7% +$607k |
78% | −7.0pp | 80/300 $627k |
26d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 82 | xiaojian888999 EWY · TSM · CAP +5
🤖 125-day track is short; 26.42% ROI with zero drawdown and only $43K AUM suggests risk masking or tiny sample. The sharp weekly swings from -15.61% to +26.42% indicate extreme volatility, not consistent skill. |
+26.4% +$111k |
59% | −25.7pp | 28/301 $43k |
125d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 83 | ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 53-day track record is extremely short, and $154.88 AUM with only 1 copier signals near-zero real trust. The 45% return with zero drawdown likely reflects tiny position sizes or leverage artifacts, not genuine edge. |
+45.0% +$107k |
52% | −9.3pp | 1/300 $155 |
53d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 84 | Time+yong ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-17.6% −$30k |
52% | −12.5pp | 36/300 $246k |
136d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 85 | Firm-Liveness-Jack ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 36-day track with 9.21% PnL but zero AUM and no copiers, plus a suspiciously stable 10-13% weekly return range. The main red flag is the implausible consistency—real markets don't produce such narrow weekly swings. |
+9.2% +$14k |
61% | −3.2pp | 0/300 $0 |
36d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 86 | jas***@gmail.com ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 17-day track record with zero AUM and no copiers, yet 5.23% PnL and 62.5% win rate. The sample is too short and lacks real follower capital to validate any strategy. |
+5.2% +$18k |
62% | −2.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
17d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 87 | KoreanTop ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+774.0% +$177k |
47% | −300.5pp | 391/800 $267k |
93d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 88 | Chasing_C ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+0.9% +$4.4k |
64% | −0.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
52d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 89 | @guli-1688 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-28.6% −$971k |
52% | −15.7pp | 5/300 $457 |
478d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 90 | Short it. ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-29.2% −$188k |
54% | −34.5pp | 1/300 $5.0k |
407d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 91 | Striped-Shard-AirCon WLFI
|
+12.2% +$54k |
44% | −6.7pp | 0/300 $0 |
166d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 92 | Luckyboytt ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 14.22% ROI on just 37 days with zero drawdown reported and only $18.4K AUM suggests tiny sample size and possible leverage distortion. The 64.71% win rate is meaningless without knowing risk-adjusted metrics or drawdown history. |
+14.2% +$71k |
65% | −16.2pp | 43/300 $18k |
37d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 93 | hyperion.exe ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 17-day track record with 72.22% win rate and 7.03% PnL, but only $2,286 AUM and zero drawdown reported alongside 12.7% weekly peaks. The tiny follower capital and implausibly smooth returns suggest the strategy may not survive real market stress. |
+7.0% +$14k |
72% | −5.7pp | 8/300 $2.3k |
17d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 94 | afeiwin ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-52.3% −$314k |
57% | −38.9pp | 26/300 $2.9k |
308d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 95 | ZCM5535 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-16.8% −$49k |
59% | −16.9pp | 4/300 $532 |
277d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 96 | s4150 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+102.1% +$183k |
46% | −31.4pp | 7/300 $790 |
127d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 97 | fuying8987 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-32.5% −$71k |
50% | −18.7pp | 0/300 $0 |
185d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 98 | 15M_ ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+36.8% +$75k |
42% | −24.1pp | 0/300 $0 |
102d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 99 | Trim-Layer-GearStick ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 45-day track record with 15.15% PnL but zero AUM and no copiers signals extreme distrust. The consistent 8-20% weekly returns with no drawdown data suggest unrealistic risk smoothing or leverage artifacts. |
+15.2% +$22k |
64% | −15.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
45d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 100 | Zs+++ ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+66.4% +$129k |
48% | −68.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
66d |
aggressive
|
Verify ↗ |
* PnL and win rate as reported by OKX's public copy-trading API — not our verification. Source: OKX public API /api/v5/copytrading/public-lead-traders (SWAP).
How the Trader Safe Score works
Deterministic and published — same numbers in, same score out. Durability and trust dominate by construction:
Estabilidad /30Worst week-over-week drop of the cumulative PnL curve. A smooth grind beats a rocket with cliffs; short histories get a haircut.
Lead track /25360+ days scores full points. Three brilliant weeks prove nothing.
Copier trust /25Real copiers with real funds following. High PnL with ~zero copiers and dust AUM is a display account — capped hard.
Tasa de aciertos /1045–78% is healthy. Near-100% on futures usually means losers are held open, not closed — that scores low.
Reported PnL /10Moderate positive scores best. Triple-digit PnL scores lower — eso es apetito de apalancamiento, no habilidad.
Agregador de 3 exchanges
Puntaje de Seguridad Independiente
Crítica de IA sobre cada trader
También mostramos a los perdedores
Prueba gratis, sin depósito
No solo copies — prueba primero, luego construye el tuyo propio
El movimiento del caballo: en mercados líquidos (BTC, ETH, SOL, oro, índices) una cuenta virtual con precios en vivo y cálculos de comisiones reales te dice casi todo lo que una fondeada lo haría — sin arriesgar un centavo. Ensaya aquí, despliega en el exchange solo cuando los números sobrevivan.
🧪 Ensaya con una cuenta virtual de $10k
Bots de papel con precios en vivo, comisiones reales, stop-loss y take-profit — incluyendo los perdedores. Sin depósito, sin claves, sin riesgo.
Abrir demo gratis
🛠 Construye tu propio bot
Nuestro motor Go + Python realiza backtesting de 534 monedas con divisiones honestas de muestra interna / muestra externa — configuraciones que ningún constructor de exchanges te da.
Abre el optimizador
🎓 Aprende a leer estadísticas de traders
Por qué un ROI del 800% es una advertencia, qué esconde un drawdown del 0.00% y cuándo miente un ratio Sharpe. Nuestra metodología, en palabras simples.
Leer la metodología
⚖️
Caja de honestidad. Todos los números de rendimiento provienen de la API oficial de copy-trading pública de OKX y son cifras propias de OKX — las reordenamos, no las verificamos. La instantánea se actualiza diariamente (actual: 2026-07-28 06:20 UTC). Esta página contiene un enlace de afiliado: registrarse en OKX a través de él nos genera una comisión sin costo para ti — ese sesgo es exactamente por qué nuestro puntaje apenas recompensa el PnL reportado. El copy trading puede perder dinero y los traders apalancados pueden ser liquidados. Nada de esto es consejo de inversión; nuestro propio veredicto de investigación sobre la mayoría de las estrategias sistemáticas sigue siendo
ningún edge comprobado.
¿Listo para copiar a un trader que realmente verificaste?
Regístrate en OKX a través de nuestro enlace — gratis, los fondos permanecen en OKX — luego copia a cualquier trader directamente desde su perfil.