Xiaoyao Lee
EWY · SPK · TSM +5
100/ 100 Trader Safe Score
Reported PnL+6.8% (+$12k)
Worst week−4.6pp
Lead track1280d
Copiers · funds444/600 · $137k
OKX lead traders, ranked by durability — not by hype
These are real copy-trading lead traders from OKX's official public API, re-ranked by our Trader Safe Score: track length, real copiers with real money and week-to-week stability count for far more than any headline PnL. Browsing is free, no account needed.
1
Browse the rating — freeEvery trader, every warning sign, straight from OKX's public data.
2
Verify on OKXEach row links to the trader's live OKX profile — check every number at the source.
3
Register via our linkCopying happens on OKX with your funds on OKX. We earn a commission — that's how this stays free.
Safe Core — the shortlist we'd actually consider
Top scores under a formula where boring wins: long track, many real copiers, no violent weeks.
Jungle law
XAU · SOL · DOGE +5
100/ 100 Trader Safe Score
Reported PnL+5.2% (+$355k)
Worst week−1.4pp
Lead track720d
Copiers · funds426/1207 · $9.5M
PlymouthUltra
ICP · JUP · MINA +5
100/ 100 Trader Safe Score
Reported PnL+10.7% (+$1.2k)
Worst week−1.2pp
Lead track1144d
Copiers · funds246/1200 · $99k
Full Trader Safe Score rating
All lead traders from OKX's public leaderboard, best to worst under our formula. Loud PnL with no copiers and dust funds scores exactly what it deserves.
| # | 交易者 | PnL* | Curve | 胜率 | Worst wk | Copiers | Track | Safe Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xiaoyao Lee EWY · SPK · TSM +5
🤖 Despite 1280 lead days, the 6.76% total PnL is modest and recent weekly returns show volatility from -3.53% to 11.36%. The genuine strength is a long track record with only 60% win rate, suggesting consistent but not exceptional risk management. |
+6.8% +$12k |
60% | −4.6pp | 444/600 $137k |
1280d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 2 | Jungle law XAU · SOL · DOGE +5
🤖 The 720-day track record is solid, but the 5.22% weekly PnL with zero drawdown reported is suspiciously smooth for a 65% win rate. The genuine strength is the large personal AUM aligned with copiers, reducing incentive for reckless risk. |
+5.2% +$355k |
65% | −1.4pp | 426/1207 $9.5M |
720d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 3 | PlymouthUltra ICP · JUP · MINA +5
🤖 Red flags: 1144 days but only 10.66% total PnL suggests extremely low risk-taking, and zero drawdown data is missing. Genuine strength: the 73.68% win rate is consistent, but the flat weekly PnL curve indicates minimal volatility, not skill. |
+10.7% +$1.2k |
74% | −1.2pp | 246/1200 $99k |
1144d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 4 | BestMax ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 754-day track record is solid, but the 73.53% win rate with only one negative weekly print suggests risk is masked by frequent small wins. The genuine strength is the consistent positive weekly returns over two years, though low volatility may hide tail risks. |
+5.0% +$5.1k |
74% | −2.2pp | 175/600 $179k |
754d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 5 | To the Moon Merchant XAU · SOL · TRUMP +5
🤖 1060 days is a solid track, but the 20.72% latest PnL is far below the 33.08% peak, showing declining momentum. The genuine strength is the long, consistent history that reduces the risk of a short-lived fluke. |
+20.7% +$43k |
53% | −13.0pp | 1185/1200 $2.6M |
1060d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 6 | Shallow-Pair-Frog ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+22.2% +$78k |
56% | −5.6pp | 350/600 $224k |
984d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 7 | 年内完成一个小目标 EWY · SPK · TSM +5
🤖 Red flags: 487 days but only $9K AUM and 45 copiers, with 18.53% ROI yet zero drawdown reported—likely leverage or data smoothing. The genuine strength is a consistent upward weekly PnL trend over the last 10 periods. |
+18.5% +$34k |
60% | −2.1pp | 45/300 $9.1k |
487d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 8 | Aspirin. ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 472 days with 54% win rate yet AUM is only $25k and weekly PnL% swings from 36% to 46% show inconsistent returns. The biggest caution is the massive gap between reported PnL and tiny follower money, suggesting this strategy may not scale or survive drawdowns. |
+36.2% +$54k |
54% | −9.3pp | 106/300 $25k |
472d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 9 | Mu BingYang ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 26% ROI over 336 days with zero drawdown reported is unrealistic; only 55 copiers out of 302 total suggests minimal trust. The flat weekly PnL% range indicates likely compounding or leverage artifacts, not organic growth. |
+26.0% +$40k |
56% | −2.7pp | 55/302 $370k |
336d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 10 | Firsthand-ATL-Pansy ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+62.0% +$51k |
65% | −3.9pp | 55/300 $6.2k |
340d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 11 | Mark6666 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+73.2% +$63k |
48% | −13.2pp | 109/300 $15k |
187d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 12 | 金条大爷 ICP · JUP · MINA +5
🤖 822% ROI over 661 days with zero drawdown is implausible, and only $55K AUM from 46 copiers suggests low trust. The flat -0.35% weeks early on hint at hidden risk or data gaps. |
+822.3% +$261k |
66% | −0.2pp | 46/300 $56k |
661d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 13 | Linxixi ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 498 days of data but zero drawdown alongside 39.96% ROI and only $6.6K AUM suggests risk is hidden or the track record is cherry-picked. The genuine strength is the consistent weekly returns, but the tiny follower money implies copiers doubt the reliability. |
+40.0% +$102k |
57% | −9.0pp | 46/600 $6.7k |
498d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 14 | DegenBing ICP · JUP · MINA +5
|
+12.7% +$83k |
52% | −4.3pp | 3/300 $124 |
962d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 15 | Master Dust. ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 96.67% ROI with zero max drawdown reported is implausible, and only $219K AUM from 261 copiers suggests tiny average allocations. The 345-day track is too short to trust such extreme risk-adjusted returns. |
+96.7% +$267k |
60% | −30.7pp | 261/300 $220k |
345d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 16 | Mine13 ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+3.9% +$10k |
54% | −6.3pp | 110/602 $462k |
286d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 17 | Upward right BTC · ETH
|
-21.0% −$253k |
50% | −10.2pp | 186/600 $71k |
865d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 18 | Gloomy-Signal-Aronia ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 9.63% ROI on $22k profit but only $4.6k follower AUM and zero drawdown reported—short 327-day track record with suspiciously smooth weekly gains. The biggest red flag is implausible risk control: no losing weeks in 10 data points suggests hidden leverage or selective reporting. |
+9.6% +$22k |
58% | −4.8pp | 30/300 $4.6k |
327d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 19 | Pretty-Longmeixi-760 CAP · SAMSUNG · AAOI +4
🤖 Red flags: 63-day track record, zero maximum drawdown reported alongside 28.21% ROI, and only 219 copiers on $511K AUM suggest data gaps or risk concealment. The genuine strength is a consistent 30%+ weekly return over 10 weeks, but verify if this is from leverage or actual edge. |
+28.2% +$93k |
68% | −5.8pp | 219/300 $511k |
63d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 20 | speculation emperor ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 10.05% PnL with 56.67% win rate is decent, but 1039 days of data show a -11.43% weekly loss and only $37k AUM from 24 copiers. The real caution is the severe drawdowns hidden behind the headline return—this trader’s losses are larger and more frequent than the average gain suggests. |
+10.1% +$147k |
57% | −7.5pp | 24/300 $37k |
1039d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 21 | TradingNotes SOL · DOGE · XRP +3
|
+21.4% +$65k |
46% | −8.1pp | 18/301 $104k |
539d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 22 | HWAN100 EWY · SPK · TSM +5
|
+12.8% +$129k |
49% | −0.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
497d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 23 | 好望角9999 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 201% ROI over 543 days with only $33.6K AUM from 172 copiers suggests inflated returns from a small base. The zero drawdown and high weekly PnL consistency likely reflect leverage-driven volatility rather than sustainable edge. |
+201.3% +$416k |
57% | −24.4pp | 172/601 $34k |
543d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 24 | 0xleek.eth ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 25.86% ROI over 250 days with zero drawdown is implausible, and only $25K AUM from 4 copiers signals negligible trust. The genuine strength is the 55% win rate, but the missing drawdown data makes the returns unreliable for copying. |
+25.9% +$27k |
55% | −3.4pp | 4/303 $25k |
250d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 25 | 时间很有限 SOL · WLD · BNB +5
|
+19.0% +$45k |
45% | −3.4pp | 1/300 $50 |
1175d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 26 | btctangying ETHW · BTC
🤖 61.13% ROI over 1063 days hides a suspiciously flat equity curve with zero drawdown, while only $4167 AUM from 12 copiers suggests minimal real trust. The steady weekly returns near 60% likely reflect compounding leverage or deposit artifacts, not genuine trading skill. |
+61.1% +$58k |
52% | −6.4pp | 12/300 $4.2k |
1063d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 27 | pikawenjiantouzi EWY · RAVE · TSM +5
|
+58.8% +$147k |
47% | −20.5pp | 106/609 $87k |
254d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 28 | 134***6656 EWY · TSM · SPK +5
|
+36.6% +$36k |
48% | −6.2pp | 17/300 $2.2k |
587d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 29 | White-Block-Rims ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+50.4% +$293k |
61% | −5.5pp | 21/300 $3.5k |
1059d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 30 | YEREN-CHINA ICP · JUP · MINA +5
|
+31.2% +$56k |
53% | −18.6pp | 76/300 $13k |
608d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 31 | 人生没有如果 只有后果和结果 ETH
|
-11.4% −$45k |
50% | −10.8pp | 48/300 $37k |
551d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 32 | Regression ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-16.2% −$21k |
57% | −11.0pp | 56/300 $33k |
611d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 33 | Jerry杰睿 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 231 days is a short track record, and 7.72% PnL with zero drawdown is suspiciously smooth. The tiny copier count (28 of 318) suggests experienced followers are avoiding this strategy. |
+7.7% +$15k |
64% | −5.2pp | 28/318 $132k |
231d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 34 | sushansuying ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+5.7% +$14k |
56% | −3.6pp | 0/300 $0 |
272d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 35 | Monumental-DoS-Tiger ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+6.0% +$28k |
46% | −4.5pp | 0/300 $0 |
240d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 36 | Renoshi ICP · JUP · COMP +5
|
-2.0% −$36k |
51% | −2.0pp | 3/300 $844 |
711d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 37 | Key-JOMO-Yaupon SOL · BNB · BTC +1
|
-4.6% −$16k |
50% | −2.3pp | 3/300 $250 |
761d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 38 | CCaptain ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+1.3% +$2.1k |
59% | −1.8pp | 5/300 $258 |
270d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 39 | 稳稳赚钱 LDO · SOL · SUI +5
|
-8.1% −$29k |
51% | −4.9pp | 7/300 $9.2k |
812d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 40 | Sean Nexus Alpha ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 45.48% ROI over 307 days with only $3096 AUM and 14 copiers suggests inflated returns from tiny capital, while zero drawdown in the weekly data is implausible. The biggest red flag is that this trader's actual risk profile is hidden, as small accounts can show extreme returns from leverage or luck. |
+45.5% +$38k |
53% | −5.3pp | 14/300 $3.1k |
307d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 41 | xiaomijiahanyangzao ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 319-day track is short; 27.91% ROI with only $3,382 AUM and 15 copiers suggests minimal real trust. The near-flat weekly PnL% range (25.8–30.58) implies low volatility, not necessarily skill. |
+27.9% +$72k |
54% | −5.8pp | 15/300 $3.4k |
319d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 42 | Decent-Wallet-Bamboo ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 114-day track with 9.35% ROI yet only $300 AUM and 1 copier signals zero trust. The steady weekly gains with no drawdown suggest either tiny position sizing or a smoothed reporting artifact. |
+9.3% +$14k |
55% | −2.2pp | 1/300 $300 |
114d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 43 | Known-Cloud ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 130% ROI with zero drawdown and only 215 days of data is suspicious; copier capital is just $173K despite 205 followers. The huge weekly volatility (28% to 213%) suggests extreme leverage risk, not consistent skill. |
+130.8% +$261k |
60% | −50.0pp | 205/600 $173k |
215d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 44 | Green-ASIC-Cactus EWY · TSM · CAP +5
🤖 435 days but zero AUM and no copiers despite 5.35% PnL; the weekly PnL shows three consecutive -2.13% losses. The biggest red flag is no one trusts this trader with real money. |
+5.3% +$22k |
58% | −9.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
435d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 45 | 1491 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+3.3% +$33k |
51% | −17.3pp | 90/600 $18k |
1046d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 46 | kaiwin ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
+40.5% +$525k |
42% | −25.8pp | 46/600 $10k |
573d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 47 | Harsh-Close-Auto ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 26% profit on just $1.4K AUM with 222 days of data shows extreme leverage risk, not skill. The tiny follower base and zero drawdown disclosure suggest the strategy is untested under real market stress. |
+26.2% +$132k |
56% | −7.3pp | 6/300 $1.4k |
222d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 48 | YXN EWY · HOOD · EWJ +5
🤖 Red flags: 248-day track with zero drawdown and 48% ROI is implausible; AUM is only $395 with just 2 copiers. The flat weekly PnL% for six consecutive weeks suggests stale or manipulated data. |
+48.3% +$65k |
52% | −7.6pp | 2/300 $395 |
248d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 49 | Ruddy-BTD-Moose ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 288-day track with 11.93% total PnL and 51% win rate is mediocre, while $53 AUM and 1 copier signal near-zero real trust. The biggest red flag is a tiny personal stake despite claiming $130k profit—likely leverage or position-size artifacts inflating returns. |
+11.9% +$131k |
51% | −7.3pp | 1/300 $53 |
288d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 50 | Expert-Ethash-Camel OKB · BTC · ETH
|
-7.7% −$19k |
53% | −49.1pp | 387/1001 $285k |
952d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 51 | 凤妤同舟币姐 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-1.4% −$2.6k |
55% | −3.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
516d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 52 | Scofield_2025 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-4.8% −$32k |
55% | −2.2pp | 0/300 $0 |
413d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 53 | bsjggyx66 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 131 days with zero AUM and no copiers suggests fabricated or demo-only performance. The 7.63% weekly PnL with zero drawdown is mathematically impossible in real trading. The biggest red flag is the complete absence of real follower capital despite a 55.56% win rate. |
+7.6% +$11k |
56% | −1.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
131d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 54 | galaxy* SOL · DOGE · BTC +1
|
+497.1% +$123k |
47% | −156.3pp | 214/600 $39k |
1156d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 55 | kvss ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+59.5% +$76k |
49% | −21.6pp | 18/300 $4.8k |
471d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 56 | huge77788 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+2.9% +$4.9k |
51% | −4.2pp | 1/300 $28k |
92d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 57 | liyuan-luo ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 583-day track with 68.94% PnL but only $1,525 AUM and 1 copier signals extreme distrust; zero drawdown data alongside 71.73% weekly peaks suggests risky volatility. The genuine strength is the recent 10-week positive streak, but the tiny follower base outweighs any performance. |
+68.9% +$134k |
61% | −20.0pp | 1/300 $1.5k |
583d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 58 | Trader KS XAU · BTC · ETH
|
-23.2% −$80k |
50% | −28.0pp | 43/300 $21k |
635d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 59 | 展星理财 CRV · DOGE · CL +5
|
+38.1% +$116k |
44% | −7.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
871d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 60 | Amusing-PoW-AirBags ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+97.6% +$215k |
81% | −37.4pp | 417/600 $223k |
77d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 61 | Rude-Gems-Leopard ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+28.2% +$137k |
80% | −38.2pp | 225/600 $116k |
75d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 62 | Bitlong PEOPLE · WLD · SATS +3
|
+1.3% +$4.5k |
60% | −0.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
742d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 63 | dong ge@ ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+0.8% +$4.5k |
56% | −6.3pp | 0/300 $0 |
458d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 64 | Dry-ATL-Antenna ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 315 days is a short track record, and the 7.18% ROI is modest with a 56.82% win rate. The main caution is the recent -9.38% weekly loss, showing significant volatility despite the overall positive trend. |
+7.2% +$58k |
57% | −18.2pp | 33/600 $44k |
315d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 65 | Ail.Wang ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
|
-2.4% −$22k |
56% | −7.8pp | 8/303 $31k |
924d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 66 | Steep-TLT-Motor ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-0.2% −$495 |
51% | −0.5pp | 0/600 $0 |
302d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 67 | Notable-Band-Iguana BTC · ETH
|
+7.1% +$7.9k |
49% | −6.4pp | 1/301 $500 |
103d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 68 | Miss S ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-7.2% −$33k |
54% | −4.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
288d |
safe
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 69 | Ewan luck ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 882天但仅有4周活跃数据，133.7美元AUM仅1个跟单者，极度警示。真正风险在于微小实盘记录背后未经检验的策略。 |
+15.7% +$52k |
63% | −33.7pp | 1/300 $134 |
882d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 70 | Adored-Browser-Frog ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+110.7% +$249k |
83% | −22.1pp | 600/600 $346k |
75d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 71 | Elsa6688 BTC · ETH
🤖 164天记录较短；249%回报率且零回撤在统计上不可信。极低的跟单者与AUM比率表明经验丰富的跟随者缺乏真正信心。 |
+249.6% +$143k |
61% | −29.6pp | 72/300 $192k |
164d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 72 | Auroraxwt ICP · NEIRO · MINA +5
🤖 仅26天数据，零回撤伴随16.23%周峰值回报率，暗示极端风险承担或数据操纵。极少的跟单者数量（302人中8人）和短暂记录使其未经可持续跟单交易验证。 |
+8.3% +$23k |
52% | −4.9pp | 8/302 $31k |
26d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 73 | Bare-Payee-Fox ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-21.6% −$39k |
52% | −18.6pp | 43/300 $7.3k |
184d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 74 | RuiJie EWY · SPK · TSM +5
|
-4.3% −$47k |
53% | −8.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
593d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 75 | Busy-Satoshi-Aralia ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-2.2% −$4.7k |
56% | −5.6pp | 0/300 $0 |
518d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 76 | Andyvillajr ICP · JUP · MINA +5
|
-0.1% −$544 |
52% | −7.3pp | 0/300 $0 |
878d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 77 | Linuxzhang BTC
|
-13.2% −$35k |
54% | −8.6pp | 0/300 $0 |
593d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 78 | Muted-Bandwidth-Fox BTC
|
-9.5% −$33k |
56% | −15.4pp | 27/300 $9.5k |
702d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 79 | Measly-qihang ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-7.2% −$20k |
53% | −9.9pp | 2/300 $167 |
187d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 80 | Mark1982 EWY · RAVE · TSM +5
|
-9.3% −$29k |
52% | −6.2pp | 2/300 $100 |
335d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 81 | OmniPos BTC · ETH
🤖 26天记录105%回报率但零回撤不现实；80个跟单者对62.7万美元AUM表明跟随者信念极低。周盈亏波动（85-108%）表明可能急剧反转的极端风险。 |
+105.7% +$607k |
78% | −7.0pp | 80/300 $627k |
26d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 82 | xiaojian888999 EWY · TSM · CAP +5
🤖 125天记录较短；26.42%回报率零回撤仅4.3万美元AUM暗示风险掩盖或样本过小。从-15.61%到+26.42%的剧烈周波动表明极端波动性，而非稳定技能。 |
+26.4% +$111k |
59% | −25.7pp | 28/301 $43k |
125d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 83 | ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 53天记录极短，154.88美元AUM仅1个跟单者表明近乎零真实信任。45%回报率零回撤可能反映微小头寸规模或杠杆假象，而非真正优势。 |
+45.0% +$107k |
52% | −9.3pp | 1/300 $155 |
53d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 84 | Time+yong ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-17.6% −$30k |
52% | −12.5pp | 36/300 $246k |
136d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 85 | Firm-Liveness-Jack ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 36天记录9.21%盈亏但零AUM无跟单者，加上可疑稳定的10-13%周回报范围。主要警示是难以置信的稳定性——真实市场不会产生如此狭窄的周波动。 |
+9.2% +$14k |
61% | −3.2pp | 0/300 $0 |
36d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 86 | jas***@gmail.com ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 17天记录零AUM无跟单者，却有5.23%盈亏和62.5%胜率。样本太短且缺乏真实跟随者资本来验证任何策略。 |
+5.2% +$18k |
62% | −2.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
17d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 87 | KoreanTop ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+774.0% +$177k |
47% | −300.5pp | 391/800 $267k |
93d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 88 | Chasing_C ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+0.9% +$4.4k |
64% | −0.4pp | 0/300 $0 |
52d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 89 | @guli-1688 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-28.6% −$971k |
52% | −15.7pp | 5/300 $457 |
478d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 90 | Short it. ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-29.2% −$188k |
54% | −34.5pp | 1/300 $5.0k |
407d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 91 | Striped-Shard-AirCon WLFI
|
+12.2% +$54k |
44% | −6.7pp | 0/300 $0 |
166d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 92 | Luckyboytt ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 仅37天14.22%回报率报告零回撤仅1.84万美元AUM，表明样本量小且可能存在杠杆扭曲。64.71%胜率在未知风险调整指标或回撤历史下毫无意义。 |
+14.2% +$71k |
65% | −16.2pp | 43/300 $18k |
37d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 93 | hyperion.exe ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 17天记录72.22%胜率7.03%盈亏，但仅2286美元AUM报告零回撤伴随12.7%周峰值。极小的跟随者资本和看似平滑的回报表明策略可能无法承受真实市场压力。 |
+7.0% +$14k |
72% | −5.7pp | 8/300 $2.3k |
17d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 94 | afeiwin ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-52.3% −$314k |
57% | −38.9pp | 26/300 $2.9k |
308d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 95 | ZCM5535 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-16.8% −$49k |
59% | −16.9pp | 4/300 $532 |
277d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 96 | s4150 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+102.1% +$183k |
46% | −31.4pp | 7/300 $790 |
127d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 97 | fuying8987 ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
-32.5% −$71k |
50% | −18.7pp | 0/300 $0 |
185d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 98 | 15M_ ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+36.8% +$75k |
42% | −24.1pp | 0/300 $0 |
102d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 99 | Trim-Layer-GearStick ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
🤖 45天记录15.15%盈亏但零AUM无跟单者，表明极度不信任。一致的8-20%周回报无回撤数据暗示不现实的风险平滑或杠杆假象。 |
+15.2% +$22k |
64% | −15.8pp | 0/300 $0 |
45d |
balanced
|
Verify ↗ | |
| 100 | Zs+++ ICP · MINA · NEIRO +5
|
+66.4% +$129k |
48% | −68.0pp | 0/300 $0 |
66d |
aggressive
|
Verify ↗ |
* 盈亏和胜率由OKX公开跟单交易API报告——非我们验证。 Source: OKX public API /api/v5/copytrading/public-lead-traders (SWAP).
交易者安全评分如何运作
确定且公开——相同输入，相同输出。持久性和信任在构建中占主导地位：
稳定性 /30累计盈亏曲线最差周环比跌幅。平滑增长优于带悬崖的火箭；短历史会被打折。
Lead track /25360天以上得满分。三周辉煌证明不了什么。
跟单者信任 /25真实跟单者用真实资金跟随。高盈亏但近乎零跟单者和微量AUM是展示账户——上限严格。
胜率 /1045–78%为健康。期货接近100%通常意味着亏损头寸未平仓——评分低。
Reported PnL /10中等正向评分最佳。三位数盈亏评分 较低 ——那是杠杆偏好，而非技能。
3家交易所聚合器
独立安全评分
每位交易者的AI评论
我们也展示亏损者
免费测试，无需存款
不要只是复制——先测试，然后构建你自己的
骑士的移动：在流动性市场（BTC、ETH、SOL、黄金、指数）上，一个带有实时价格和真实费用计算的虚拟账户几乎能告诉你所有实盘账户能告诉你的信息——而且不冒一分钱的风险。在这里演练，只有当数字经得起考验时，才在交易所部署。
⚖️
诚实箱。 所有业绩数据来自 OKX官方公开跟单交易API 且为OKX自身数据——我们重新排名，不验证。快照每日刷新（当前： 2026-07-28 06:20 UTC）。
本页包含 联盟链接：通过它注册OKX我们赚取佣金，对您无额外费用——这种偏见正是我们评分几乎不奖励报告盈亏的原因。跟单交易可能亏损，杠杆交易者可能被清算。此处无投资建议；我们对大多数系统化策略的研究结论仍是
且没有经过验证的优势.